El Salvador
, one of the smallest countries in Central America
, is an unlikely home for what has become the third largest Palestinian diaspora in Latin America
, after Chile
and neighboring Honduras
. But it is precisely the opportunities afforded by a yet undiversified economy that drew the newcomers from
Palestinian Immigration to El Salvador
The majority of Palestinians who migrated to El Salvador in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were Christians from Bethlehem and the surrounding villages of
The migration wave began under the Ottoman Empire , in the 1880s, earning the new migrants the inaccurate moniker turcos, or Turks – an ironic pejorative given that those migrants were Arabs fleeing Ottoman (and by extension Turkish) oppression. Emigration followed under the Young Turks regime and peaked in 1910, following the application of a military conscription law on non-Muslims, which motivated many Christian families to send military-age children to the Americas to avoid forced service and continued for similar reasons under World War I .
Most of those early migrants had not intended to settle in El Salvador. They had bought tickets to the United States , with Latin America being a point of transit, but upon arriving at a South American or Caribbean port (such as Colombia, Cuba , the Dominican Republic , or Haiti ), they were told they had reached their final destination and forced to disembark. Some reached El Salvador as an accidental consequence of migration laws elsewhere in the Americas. Prior to the US Civil War , immigration to the United States was largely unregulated. But after 1876, restrictions on immigration to the US – first for Chinese and later other foreign nationals – coincided with relatively open immigration laws in Honduras. Although aimed at encouraging migration from Europe and the United States, these reforms established Honduras – and by extension Central America – as a top destination for Palestinian migration. Migrants settled on the Atlantic coast and concentrated in San Pedro Sula ; some moved on to El Salvador. Honduras’s liberal immigration laws later grew more restrictive as a result of nativist backlash against the new migrants, which pushed more Palestinians from Honduras to El Salvador.
In El Salvador, the new arrivals acquired a (mostly negative) reputation for business acumen, sparking xenophobia and demand from the creole business community to restrict their migration. In 1921, El Salvador declared both Arabs and Chinese to be “pernicious” races. The Great Depression of 1929
deepened nativist antipathy toward immigrant-owned businesses and immigrant workers competing over scarce jobs. In 1933, the dictator Maximiliano Hernández Martínez
– who in the previous year had carried out a genocidal campaign against a rural uprising made up of indigenous landless farmers, killing tens of thousands – formally barred all Africans and Asians from migrating to the country, naming specifically “new immigrants from
Developments in Palestine further restricted movement, even before the founding of the State of Israel. Under Ottoman rule, circular migration between Palestine and the Americas had been common. Under the British Mandate, the new authorities created a formal Palestinian nationality in 1925, placing new visa restrictions on emigrants. Many Palestinians in the Americas were unable to obtain the documentation required to establish nationality or legal residency and became stateless. And in 1948, Israel’s founding ended legal Palestinian nationality and thus gave finality to the one-way nature of Palestinian emigration. The dream of many emigrants, to work to save money and retire in Palestine, was no longer possible. The loss of an option to return, as well as anti-Arab discrimination in their adopted countries, incentivized Palestinians to assimilate into their new surroundings. They gradually married outside of the community, spoke Spanish exclusively, and hispanicized their names.
Notable families settled primarily in the capital, San Salvador , and Sonsonate , as well as San Miguel , Santa Ana , La Unión , and Usulutan . Prominent names include the Bahaia, Barake, Bukele, Dabdoub, Gadala, Hanania, Hándal, Hasbún, Hirezi, Jacir, Kattan, Kury, Nasser, Saade, Saca, Safie, Salume, Samour, Sedán, Simán, Suadi, and Zablah families. They came to establish themselves first in retail clothing, and later in the banking, construction, furniture, groceries, pharmaceuticals, textiles, and tobacco industries; in the twenty-first century, some entered advertising and public relations. Early start-ups were aided by Palestinian business associations and access to low interest loans from within the community. Palestinian migrants did not compete with the established business oligarchy, which was concentrated exclusively in agribusiness; they had neither the means nor the desire to purchase large tracts of land for cultivation. Instead, they entered other sectors such as retail commerce and banking left open to newcomers by the fourteen families.
Participation in Salvadoran Politics
Politically, the Palestinian community has a reputation for being conservative. This reflects its continued uniform concentration in the business sector. In comparison to Chile, where Palestinian business owners leveraged their commercial success into careers in other fields including law, medicine, media, and academia, El Salvador’s more limited educational system made the preferred career path of Palestinian families to maintain the family business.
This right-leaning political skew is not uniform, however. A few better known Palestinian Salvadorans on the left include
In El Salvador, the Cold War
turned hot in the 1980s, and the United States provided support for the Salvadoran government in a counterinsurgency campaign against rebels led by Hándal. The association of Palestinian nationalism with domestic leftist movements such as Hándal’s FMLN (and beyond El Salvador, with the governments of Nicaragua
and Cuba) put a chill on Palestinian nationalism in the business community and gave the
Two presidents of the right,
President Nayib Bukele (elected in 2019) embodies the reputation of the community in some ways and contradicts it in others. The grandson of Palestinian Christians from Bethlehem and
Bukele did not feel his Palestinian identity hampered his political career, at one point telling a reporter “It doesn’t bother me if they call me a turco, although I know some continue to use that word in a pejorative manner.” His opponents unsuccessfully attempted to use it as a campaign issue. He had been photographed praying at a mosque in Mexico City , leading to “secret Muslim” rumors about the candidate, which Bukele, who alternatively professes himself to be Catholic or agnostic, denied, emphasizing that his father had converted to Islam as an adult. A smear campaign by his rival to the right, purporting to expose Bukele’s secret faith, took on comical proportions, including a doctored photograph depicting the candidate in what campaign propaganda described as “Muslim clothing.” The photo turned out to be of Bukele at a costume party, dressed as a Jedi Knight from Star Wars.
Bukele’s political career reflects the diaspora community’s ambivalence toward Palestinian nationalism. In addition to distancing himself from his father’s religion and political leanings, as mayor of San Salvador, he visited Jerusalem as an invitee to the International Mayor’s Conference
, which was seen in the Palestinian press as an effort to delegitimize the
Bukele, as well as Saca, Hándal, Siman, and others, have shown that Palestinian identity is no barrier to entry into the highest ranks of politics in a country with a once famously exclusive oligarchy. This achievement of individual Palestinians, however, does not translate into greater salience for Palestinian issues in the political sphere. Whereas the economic and political success of the Palestinian community of El Salvador is uniquely impressive, this success has also proven to be effectively isolated from questions of nationalism, homeland politics, or foreign relations at all. In comparison to Chile, where support for Palestinian statehood is bipartisan and mainstream, extending well beyond the Palestinian diaspora, El Salvador has an especially close relationship with Israel. These ties were cemented in the country’s 1980 – 1992 civil war, when 83 percent of the government’s arms imports came from Israel. El Salvador was the only country (along with Costa Rica ) to relocate its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem in 1984 (which it had vacated in 1980 following the international response to the Knesset 's enactment of the Basic Law on Jerusalem). It was also the last country to move its embassy back to Tel Aviv in 2006, during Saca’s presidency, before the United States moved its embassy to Jerusalem in late 2017.
Cultural Expressions and Popular Support
The history of anti-turco discrimination led earlier generations to downplay their Palestinian and Arab identities, which has only recently found more public expression, largely limited to culture and food. Numerous restaurants in the capital sell kebabs and baklava, typically advertised as comida arabe, and organize an Arab Gastronomy Festival. The
Some public displays of Palestinian nationalism exist, including two plazas in the capital San Salvador: one, Plaza Palestina
, which provoked criticism for featuring a map of the pre-1948 British Mandate; and a second, which led to Israel withdrawing its ambassador to El Salvador in protest of it being designated