The 1740 capitulation takes place as the balance of power shifts against the Ottoman Empire
. The empire had been at war with Persia
since 1724, and with Austria
and Russia
between 1736 and 1739. Thanks to the mediation of France
, the empire signed with Austria and Russia in 1739 the Treaty of Belgrade
which ensured Ottoman territorial integrity. This outcome puts France in a position to negotiate a capitulation that: (a) is “perpetual” (i.e. obligates future sultans); (b) consolidates earlier trade and navigatiion rights; (c) reaffirms the rights of the French clergy in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre
and the rights of Latin pilgrims in
British historical involvement in Palestine is often framed within the years 1917–1948. These dates coincide with
Cultural and Political Considerations
For centuries, particularly after the Puritan Revolution in the seventeenth century, cultural notions connected Britain with Palestine in the English imagination. These included the concept of Britain leading the “Restoration,” or “return,” of the world’s Jewish population to the Holy Land, as prophesied in the Bible (or rather, Evangelicals’ literalist reading of it). In the extreme case of the British Israelites Movement , some non-Jewish Victorian Britons believed they were the true genetic descendants of the Biblical Hebrews.
Britain’s policy toward Palestine was closely connected to its relationship with the Ottoman Empire
as a whole, yet also bore distinct features due to Britain’s particular ambitions toward the Holy Land. Britain had trade relations with the Eastern
During the Egyptian occupation, construction began on Britain’s consulate and
Ironically, while benefitting from the Egyptian occupation, Britain supported the Ottomans to regain control of the Eastern Mediterranean in 1840 (just as they had supported the Ottomans against Napoleon Bonaparte
in the siege of
Britain’s “pro-Ottoman” policy of backing the empire, while gradually undermining its sovereignty, persisted until 1880 with the end of the premiership of Benjamin Disraeli
, Britain’s first prime minister of Jewish origin. Disraeli had travelled in Palestine in his youth and authored several novels set in the Holy Land. The subsequent administration of William Gladstone
initiated a much colder relationship with the Ottomans under
The policies of all the major European powers were driven by their belief that the Ottoman Empire was the “sick man of Europe,” bound sooner or later to disintegrate, following which there would be a scramble by the surviving empires to inherit its territories. This imperial rivalry was termed the Eastern Question
. Palestine was particularly coveted by Britain, partially because of the prestige of possessing the Holy Land and partially because of Palestine’s geopolitical location. With the opening of the
Palestine was also feted as a desirable territory for other reasons. Highly biased reports by ideologically motivated travellers claimed that Palestine’s agricultural potential was currently squandered by the indigenous peasantry or filahin, and under a colonial project, it could be transformed into a hugely productive “breadbasket” for Britain. This was sometimes coupled with the suggestion of a British-supported Jewish settler colony in the area.
From the mid-nineteenth century until 1914, thousands of European and North American travellers visited Palestine annually. Travellers included diplomats, missionaries, and the personnel of the Palestine Exploration Fund , military officers who produced maps later used by the British Army in World War I. Many also travelled for their own pleasure, some producing accounts of their journeys, fuelling a huge genre of Holy Land travel literature presenting a Eurocentric and Orientalist view of Palestine. In 1868 Thomas Cook , a Baptist preacher from northern England , led the first “Cook’s Tour” to Egypt and Palestine, inaugurating the modern tourist trade in the region.
Britain and Zionism
Belief in the British role in the Jewish Restoration to Palestine was not merely an abstract idea. Throughout the nineteenth century, British figures devised plans for small- or large-scale colonization of Palestine by Jews. By the early twentieth century, the British government was in serious conversation with the Zionist Movement
about establishing a “national home” for Jews within the British Empire
. Such proposals were now largely divested of overtly religious rhetoric. However, beliefs with their origins in the Bible were integral to the views of British elites and decision-makers, such as the wartime Prime Minister David Lloyd George
and his Foreign Secretary
Britain’s decision to establish a consulate in Jerusalem may have been influenced by
The position of Lord Palmerston is also revealing of British plans for Palestine. On 11 August 1840, after the successful withdrawal of Egyptian troops from the
Most British support for Zionistic notions came from those who, like Palmerston and Shaftesbury, were not Jewish. British Jews were more concerned with securing political rights in the country where they lived, something Shaftesbury opposed at the time of the 1858 Jews Relief Act
. However, some took a close interest in Palestine. Most notable was the Italian-born financier Sir Moses Montefiore
(1784–1885) who visited Palestine several times and made donations to the Jewish community there, including an agricultural school for Jews near
The British consul in Jerusalem from 1846 to 1863, James Finn
, worked particularly vigorously to establish links between Britain and Jews in Palestine. A devout Evangelical with no Jewish ancestry, he was nevertheless known as “king of the Jews” in Jerusalem. Jewish reaction against his continual interference in the city’s Jewish community led succeeding British consuls to take a more circumspect attitude toward their “protégés.” During the Crimean War, Finn and his wife Elizabeth Anne Finn
established a farm for Jewish laborers near Jerusalem, in what is now the Kerem Avraham neighborhood
of
Sir Lawrence Oliphant
did much to connect early Zionist settlers with British elites. After a career as a colonial official, parliamentarian, novelist, and a mystic of some notoriety in Britain, Oliphant visited Palestine in 1879, hoping to identify land where a Jewish colony could be established. With Palestine too densely inhabited and cultivated, he believed that “Eastern Palestine,” the Victorians’ term for present-day
In the early twentieth century, British politicians began to take more interest in the early Zionist movement, and gaining influence among Jewish communities by offering them a “homeland” in areas within the British Empire. Britain’s ruling class also hoped to dissuade Jewish refugees from Russia from arriving in the country, hence the support of then-Prime Minister Arthur James Balfour of the 1905 Aliens Act
, which placed restrictions on Jewish immigration from Russia. After meeting with Theodor Herzl
, the Colonial Secretary Joseph Chamberlain
made offers of territory in
The Palestine Question in World War I
In November 1914, Britain declared war on the Ottoman Empire. Britain’s attempts to increase its influence in Palestine thus shifted from cultural, diplomatic, and missionary methods to a military campaign, aiming to defeat the Ottomans in Palestine and occupy their territory. This goal was advocated by Herbert Samuel , who would become the first High Commissioner for Palestine, in a memorandum to the British Cabinet entitled “The Future of Palestine ,” written in January 1915.
Britain made three conflicting promises during World War I. To Arab elites, notably the family of
Throughout the war, Palestinians suffered from Ottoman military conscription, political repression (particularly of Arab nationalist sentiment), famine exacerbated by food requisitioning and a devastating plague of locusts in 1915, and the arrival of displaced people, especially Armenians escaping the